Email is a magnificent communication tool—but not in all circumstances. Many conversations call for different—and better—communication choices.
When Is Email the Right Medium?
Email is the right communication medium for matters of relatively low importance. It’s great for sharing information. It’s awful for important conversations.
If you need to send your client some information, email is the right choice. If you want to send your client something that keeps them informed or shares your company’s point of view, like a white paper or a case study, email is perfect. You give your client what they need, and you don’t require their immediate time or attention for something that can easily wait.
The message matches the medium here; the information may be useful, but it’s not important that they act on the information or that they make a decision now (re-read this sentence, then re-read it again). When a decision is required, you need to move to a different communication tool.
When Is a Phone Call the Right Medium?
The phone is the communication tool when you need to have a conversation. It’s for matters that are more important than you would send through email.
Phone conversations sometimes require an immediate answer over a relatively important matter. Maybe you need your client to confirm some prior decision before you act. Or maybe you need confirm a change. These things can’t wait for email, and your client may need a conversation to explore her options on a relatively important, but not critical, matter. The phone is the right choice.
The phone is also the right choice for scheduling appointments, even though email works sometimes too.
You don’t want to have any important conversation over email. The delay is too long. It’s hard to gauge the tone of the text. And it can give your client the appearance that you are afraid to engage in the tough conversations that need to be had, that you are hiding. If you need to tell your client quickly about something that puts them at risk, you have to pick up the phone.
But the phone is wrong for the most important client conversations.
When Is a Face-to-Face Meeting the Right Medium?
When the conversation you need to have is really important, you need a face-to-face meeting.
When the conversation you need to have is around opening an opportunity, face-to-face is the only acceptable method. You can email the client to ask for an appointment. You can call the client to request their time. But you want to have the conversation around the opportunity in person. You need a real conversation, and you need the visual cues a face-to-face meeting provides.
If the client and the opportunity are important to you—and important to your client—make the appointment and do the work in person.
Too many salespeople believe that email is the right choice for sales tasks for which it is completely inappropriate. They want to share ideas over email, instead of in person. Afraid to ask for commitments, they fish around with soft emails that they hope will cause the client to respond to them. Some hide behind email because they don’t want to engage with the client when things go south—even though the relationship and the client are better served by a face-to-face visit.
Let your method of communicating with the client match the importance of the message. If it’s important to you or your client, choose face-to-face first.
What is the right communication method for low importance, low value, and low urgency communications?
What is the right choice for communication with for more important conversations that need a decision or a relatively low importance decision?
What is the right choice for the most important conversations you need to have with your clients?
If you want to create or move an opportunity, what is likely the right choice? Why is email the wrong choice?
What do your clients believe about you when you email them conversations that should be had in person?
Share this post with your network
Filed under: Sales 3.0